|

Chinese
control of the Panama Canal part of a global challenge for
the US
CNN/LOU DOBBS TONIGHT
Aired January 9, 2009
Transcript
DOBBS: Israel tonight says incessant rocket attacks by Hamas
led to its invasion of Gaza, but who is supplying those rockets
to Hamas? We're joined now by Gordon Chang, he's the author
of "The Coming Collapse of China," along with CNN
military analyst, General David Grange.
Thank you both for being here. Gordon, you say straight forwardly
that China is providing those rockets, both directly and indirectly
to Hamas.
GORDON CHANG, AUTHOR: Yeah, those rockets were manufactured
by Szechuan Aerospace Industry Cooperation, they were purchased
by Iran, they went by a round-about route, including Yemen
and some other places and they ended up in Hamas's hands.
Now, Iran makes the same type of weapon, 122 mm rocket, but
Hamas uses the Chinese version because it's better and I suspect
that the Iranians want some measure of deniability so they
don't use Iranian rockets, they use the Chinese ones.
DOBBS: When you say better, you're talking about they have
a longer range?
CHANG: They have a longer range. They can go 40 miles and
they can hit targets far deeper into southern Israel, like
the school in Beersheba that was attacked on December 31.
DOBBS: Why is it that the national news media, that the Bush
administration, for that matter the transition team of the,
to-be Obama administration, and the Israelis themselves are
not focusing on these facts?
CHANG: Well, Israel has talked to China privately about China's
relationship with Hamas and has gotten nowhere. So, I suspect
that Israel is looking towards Washington. But Washington,
for some reason, and I think it's because you know, we have
this very indulgent attitude towards the Chinese, really isn't
doing anything.
DOBBS: How extensive, General Grange, is China's involvement
in the Mideastern -- the conflict between the Palestinians
and the Israelis?
BRIG GEN DAVID GRANGE, CNN MILITARY ANALYST: I think there's
a lot of influence, there's a lot of influence not only by
China, but by Russia providing weaponry, I mean, a lot of
the Israeli mission was to interdict that rocket infiltration,
the cache sites, the supply dumps of those rockets set for
continuous barrage into Israel. And it's a destabilizing effect
using surrogates. And here, you are using surrogates. It's
not nation to nation, you're doing a cutout through Iran to
supply the surrogates and you disrupt it...
DOBBS: Instead, as has been the custom through the Cold War,
instead of -- well, they are rogue states, but also terrorist
organizations now rather than nation states?
GRANGE: Yeah, it's a rogue state. It's a terrorist organization,
it's also a political party and has an army supplied by people
we deal with, other nations.
DOBBS: And why, Gordon, is the United States government not
responding, here? You talked about an indulgent attitude.
It looks more like a cowering on the part of this administration.
Could that have some -- could the fact that we are dealing,
trading with a country in the case of communist China, that
holds a trillion dollars in hard reserves of our currency?
CHANG: Well, I'm sure that has something to do with it because
people in Washington correctly feel that China has a lot of
leverage over the U.S. because of this. But, you know, we
also have this view that if we're just nice to the Chinese,
they're going to reciprocate and sort of be responsible citizens
of the international community.
But the Chinese sort of look at our friendliness as a sign
of weakness, so they continue bad conduct and they see that
we reward them for it, so they don't want to destabilize the
international system. And there are many officials in Beijing
who say if they continue to destabilize the world, that they
will be the last men standing.
DOBBS: That has to be part of the strategic understanding
on the part of the U.S. military, yet there has been to, at
least to my knowledge, no strategic response on the part of
the United States to the extraordinary activity on the part
of the Chinese in this hemisphere. Their investments in this
hemisphere, their cooperation with Venezuela, with other nation
states, they have taken control of the canal that the United
States abandoned, the Panama Canal, if this is a strategic
piece of infrastructure in the hemisphere, that is certainly
it.
GRANGE: Both ends. Both ends are controlled.
DOBBS: But why in the world...
GRANGE: This is a regular warfare and this is like petro-
politics, Sharia finance, using information to indirectly
attack you during peacetime to set conditions for future conflict
if it comes about.
DOBBS: Well, let's talk about the conditions for any kind
of resolution because there are those suggesting that the
United Nations, for some reason, have gained some standing
in the public, at least in the national news media, because
they're calling for a cease-fire. This is the same organization
that's been discredited by most rational observers, but now
it's in fashion again, apparently.
What should be the template for some cease-fire and a stabilization
between Hamas and the United States - General.
GRANGE: Well, having done several peacekeeping and peace
enforcement operations, Chapter 6s and Chapter 7s, most of
them do not have teeth. And the thing is, you have, who on
the Security Council? Russia and China. And, so you, one,
have to put peace officers, keepers, that are not influenced
by a particular party or country. The other thing is, actually
I would put Chinese peacekeepers in there and hold them responsible.
DOBBS: What do you think of that idea, Gordon?
(LAUGHING)
CHANG: I think they might stop selling rockets to Hamas.
DOBBS: Well, and it would be nice too if the national news
media in its reporting on a United Nations direction for a
cease-fire, would report on who is on that Security Council
and explain the competing interest.
Thank you very much. Gordon Chang, we appreciate it. General
David Grange, thank you, sir.
GRANGE: Pleasure.
|