|

China
Blocks U.S. Cyber Warfare Efforts With New Software
By Bill Gertz
The Washington Times
May 12, 2009
China has developed more secure operating software for its
tens of millions of computers and is already installing it
on government and military systems, hoping to make Beijing's
networks impenetrable to U.S. military and intelligence agencies.
The secure operating system, known as Kylin, was disclosed
to Congress during recent hearings that provided new details
on how China's government is preparing to wage cyberwarfare
with the United States.
"We are in the early stages of a cyber arms race and
need to respond accordingly," said Kevin G. Coleman,
a private security specialist who advises the government on
cybersecurity. He discussed Kylin during a hearing of the
U.S. China Economic and Security Review Commission on April
30.
The deployment of Kylin is significant, Mr. Coleman said,
because the system has "hardened" key Chinese servers.
U.S. offensive cyberwar capabilities have been focused on
getting into Chinese government and military computers outfitted
with less secure operating systems like those made by Microsoft
Corp.
"This action also made our offensive cybercapabilities
ineffective against them, given the cyberweapons were designed
to be used against Linux, UNIX and Windows," he said.
Growing War in Cyberspace, New Hardware
The secure operating system was disclosed as computer hackers
in China - some of them sponsored by the communist government
and military - are engaged in aggressive attacks against the
United States, said officials and experts who disclosed new
details of what was described as a growing war in cyberspace.
These experts say Beijing's military is recruiting computer
hackers for its forces, including one specialist identified
in congressional testimony who set up a company that was traced
to attacks that penetrated Pentagon computers.
Chinese Embassy spokesman Wang Baodong declined immediate
comment. But Jiang Yu, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman,
said April 23 that the reports of Chinese hacking into Pentagon
computers were false.
"Relevant authorities of the Chinese government attach
great importance to cracking down on cybercrimes," Ms.
Jiang said. "We believe it is extremely irresponsible
to accuse China of being the source of attacks prior to any
serious investigation."
Mr. Coleman, a computer security specialist at Technolytics
and a consultant to the director of national intelligence
and U.S. Strategic Command, said Chinese state or state-affiliated
entities are on a wartime footing in seeking electronic information
from the U.S. government, contractors and industrial computer
networks.
Mr. Coleman said in an interview that China's Kylin system
was under development since 2001 and the first computers to
use it are government and military servers that were converted
beginning in 2007.
Additionally, Mr. Coleman said, the Chinese have developed
a secure microprocessor that, unlike U.S.-made chips, is known
to be hardened against external access by a hacker or automated
malicious software.
"If you add a hardened microchip and a hardened operating
system, that makes a really good solid platform for defending
infrastructure [from external attack]," Mr. Coleman said.
U.S. operating system software, including Microsoft, used
open-source and offshore code that makes it less secure and
vulnerable to software "trap doors" that could allow
access in wartime, he explained.
"What's so interesting from a strategic standpoint is
that in the cyberarena, China is playing chess while we're
playing checkers," he said.
China Sponsoring Worldwide Cyber War On U.S.
Asked whether the United States would win a cyberwar with
China, Mr. Coleman said it would be a draw because China,
the United States and Russia are matched equally in the new
type of warfare.
Rafal A. Rohozinski, a Canadian computer security specialist
who also testified at the commission hearing, explained how
he took part in a two-year investigation that uncovered a
sophisticated worldwide computer attack network that appeared
to be a Chinese-government-sponsored program called GhostNet,
whose electronic strikes were traced to e-mails from Hainan
island in the South China Sea.
GhostNet was able to completely take over targeted computers
and then download documents and information. Some of the data
stolen were sensitive financial and visa information on foreign
government networks at overseas embassies, Mr. Rohozinski
said.
The China-based computer network used sophisticated break-in
techniques that are generally beyond the capabilities of nongovernment
hackers, Mr. Rohozinski said.
Using surveillance techniques, the investigators observed
GhostNet hackers stealing sensitive computer documents from
embassy computers and nongovernmental organizations.
"It was a do-it-yourself signals intelligence operation,"
Mr. Rohozinski said of the network, which took over about
1,200 computers in 103 nations, targeted specifically at overseas
Tibetans linked to the exiled Dalai Lama.
Mr. Rohozinski, chief executive officer of the SecDev Group
and an advisory board member at the Citizen Lab at the Munk
Center for International Studies at the University of Toronto
in Ontario, said the GhostNet operation was likely part of
a much bigger cyberintelligence effort by China to silence
or thwart its perceived opponents.
A third computer specialist, Alan Paller, told the Senate
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs on
April 29 that China's military in 2005 recruited Tan Dailin,
a graduate student at Sichuan University, after he showed
off his hacker skills at an annual contest.
Mr. Paller, a computer security specialist with the SANS
Institute, said the Chinese military put the hacker through
a 30-day, 16-hour-a-day workshop "where he learned to
develop really high-end attacks and honed his skills."
A hacker team headed by Mr. Tan then won other computer warfare
contests against Chinese military units in Chengdu, in Sichuan
province.
China 'Well' Inside DoD Computers
Mr. Paller said that a short time later, Mr. Tan "set
up a little company. No one's exactly sure where all the money
came from, but it was in September 2005 when he won it. By
December, he was found inside [Defense Department] computers,
well inside DoD computers," Mr. Paller said.
A Pentagon official said at the time that Chinese military
hackers were detected breaking into the unclassified e-mail
on a network near the office of Defense Secretary Robert M.
Gates in June 2007.
Additional details of Chinese cyberattacks were disclosed
recently by Joel F. Brenner, the national counterintelligence
executive, the nation's most senior counterintelligence coordinator.
Mr. Brenner stated in a speech in Texas last month that cyberactivities
by China and Russia are widespread and "we know how to
deal with these," including widely reported "Chinese
penetrations of unclassified DoD networks."
"Those are more sophisticated, though hardly state of
the art," he said. "Frankly, I worry more about
attacks we can't even see, which the Russians are good at.
The Chinese are relentless and don't seem to care about getting
caught. And we have seen Chinese network operations inside
certain of our electricity grids."
Mr. Brenner said there are minimal concerns about a Chinese
cyberattack to shut down U.S. banking networks because "they
have too much money invested here.
"Our electricity grid? No, not now. But if there were
a dust-up over Taiwan, these answers might be different,"
he said.
Aggressive Chinese computer hacking has been known for years,
but the U.S. government in the past was reluctant to detail
the activities.
The CIA, for example, sponsored research in the late 1990s
that sought to minimize Chinese cyberwarfare capabilities,
under the idea that highlighting such activities would hype
the threat.
Researcher James Mulvenon, for instance, stated during a
1998 conference that China's People's Liberation Army (PLA)
"does not currently have a coherent [information warfare]
doctrine, certainly nothing compared to U.S. doctrinal writings
on the subject."
Mr. Mulvenon stated in one report that "while PLA [information
warfare] capabilities are growing, they do not match even
the primitive sophistication of their underlying strategies."
Mr. Mulvenon has since changed his views and has identified
Chinese computer-based warfare as a major threat to the Pentagon.
China, Russia, U.S. In Dead Heat
Mr. Coleman said China's military is equal to U.S. and Russian
military cyberwarfare.
"This is a three-horse race, and it is a dead heat,"
Mr. Coleman said.
The National University of China is the strategic adviser
to the Chinese military on cyberwarfare and the Ministry of
Science and Technology, he said.
Several computer security specialists recently sounded public
alarm about the growing number of cyberattacks from China
and Russia.
China, based on state-approved writings, thinks the United
States is "already is carrying out offensive cyberespionage
and exploitation against China," Mr. Coleman said.
In response, China is taking steps to protect its own computer
and information networks so that it can "go on the offensive,"
he said.
Mr. Coleman said one indication of the problem was identified
by Solutionary, a computer security company that in March
detected 128 "acts of cyberagression" tied to Internet
addresses in China.
"These acts should serve as a warning that clearly indicates
just how far along China's cyberintelligence collection capabilities
are," Mr. Coleman said.
A Pentagon spokesman, Air Force Lt. Col. Eric Butterbaugh,
would not comment on Chinese cyberattacks directly but said
"cyberspace is a war-fighting domain, critical to military
operations: We must protect it."
The Pentagon's Global Information Grid is hit with "millions
of scans" - not intrusion attempts - every day, Lt. Butterbaugh
said.
"The nature of the threat is large and diverse, and
includes recreational hackers, self-styled cybervigilantes,
various groups with nationalistic or ideological agendas,
transnational actors, and nation-states," he said. "We
have seen attempts by a variety of state and nonstate sponsored
organizations to gain unauthorized access to, or otherwise
degrade, DoD information systems."
Air Force Gen. Kevin Chilton, commander of the U.S. Strategic
Command, said May 7 that a joint cybercommand is needed under
the Pentagon to better integrate military and civilian cybercapabilities
and defenses. Gen. Chilton said he favors creating the joint
command at Fort Meade, Md., where the National Security Agency
is located. The command should be a subunit of Strategic Command,
located at Offutt Air Force Base, Neb.
Mr. Gates said last month that the National Security Council
is heading up a strategic review of U.S. cybercapabilties
and is considering creating a subunified command within Strategic
Command.
Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said Mr. Gates has not decided
on the subunified command to handle cyberwarfare issues and
is waiting for the completion of the White House review of
cyberwarfare and security issues, which is past due from the
60-day deadline imposed by Congress.
Mr. Gates "thought it would be prudent to wait for their
work before looking at potential organization structures,"
Mr. Whitman said in an interview.
http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/china_computer_spying/2009/05/12/213353.html
|